Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!apple!sun-barr!ames!sgi!key!perry
From: perry@key.COM (Perry The Cynic)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.programmer
Subject: Re: OOP & LSP (oops, Think Pascal)
Summary: What about a Lightspeed C++??
Message-ID: <841@key.COM>
Date: 23 May 89 20:28:31 GMT
References: <1384@ndmath.UUCP> <1927@internal.Apple.COM> <18612@cup.portal.com> <1887@husc6.harvard.edu> <1079@mailrus.cc.umich.edu> <1889@husc6.harvard.edu>
Reply-To: perry@arkon.key.COM (Perry The Cynic)
Organization: Key Computer Laboratories, Fremont
Lines: 18

In article <1889@husc6.harvard.edu> siegel@endor.UUCP (Rich Siegel) writes:
> 	2) Symantec sneak-previewed a versoin of THINK C with object-
> 	oriented extensions. We *will* come out with object support
> 	in THINK C, so worry not.

Oops. Does that mean that you'll try to 'roll your own' object support
for LSC, rather than adopt C++? If so, why? If not, please allay my
fears (only 1/3 :-).

Also (though I should know better than to ask), can you give us an idea as
to when it will be available? (Well, I can *try*...)

Thanks
  -- perry
-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Perry The Cynic (Peter Kiehtreiber)		     perry@arkon.key.com
** What good signature isn't taken yet? **	   ...!pacbell!key!perry