Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ukma!husc6!endor!siegel
From: siegel@endor.harvard.edu (Rich Siegel)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.programmer
Subject: Re: OOP & LSP (oops, Think Pascal)
Message-ID: <1913@husc6.harvard.edu>
Date: 24 May 89 02:40:27 GMT
References: <1384@ndmath.UUCP> <1927@internal.Apple.COM> <18612@cup.portal.com> <1887@husc6.harvard.edu> <1079@mailrus.cc.umich.edu> <1889@husc6.harvard.edu> <841@key.COM>
Sender: news@husc6.harvard.edu
Reply-To: siegel@endor.UUCP (Rich Siegel)
Organization: Symantec/THINK Technologies, Bedford, MA
Lines: 22

In article <841@key.COM> perry@arkon.key.COM (Perry The Cynic) writes:
>
>Oops. Does that mean that you'll try to 'roll your own' object support
>for LSC, rather than adopt C++? If so, why? If not, please allay my
>fears (only 1/3 :-).

	I generally don't answer any question more than 10**n times, where
n is any positive nonzero integer.....

	The language that we present will be upward-compatible with C++.

		--Rich
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 Rich Siegel
 Staff Software Developer
 Symantec Corporation, Language Products Group
 Internet: siegel@endor.harvard.edu
 UUCP: ..harvard!endor!siegel

 "She told me to make myself comfortable, so I pulled down my pants
 and sat in the pudding." -Emo Phillips
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~