Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!shelby!polya!shap From: shap@polya.Stanford.EDU (Jonathan S. Shapiro) Newsgroups: gnu.gcc Subject: Re: FSF Hypocrisy Message-ID: <9598@polya.Stanford.EDU> Date: 31 May 89 06:53:07 GMT References: <2129@internal.Apple.COM> Sender: Jonathan S. Shapiro Reply-To: shap@polya.Stanford.EDU (Jonathan S. Shapiro) Organization: Stanford University Lines: 38 In general I support Richard's views about Apple's legal stance, though I am of the opinion that the most effective way to convince them is to make it profitless for them to compete with GNU, which means supporting GNU on their system. Be that as it may, Mr. Berry has a very strong point. It is entirely inappropriate for FSF or the posters to these groups to take the de facto view that free speech should somehow not be applicable to Apple. This is in essence morally equivalent to the stance that Apple has taken in the lawsuit, which strikes me as a bitter irony. David Berry has made it possible for many of us who have watched and suffered in frustration to make use of Richard's excellent work. Many of us purchased Macintosh II's not because we wished to develop for Apple, but because they were the cheapest reasonable UNIX platform in sight from which to develop for *other* machines. If I had it to do over again now, I wouldn't buy the Apple product, both because of their legal views and because their support policies for end users suck [and they don't supply free vaseline, either]. If I could financially justify dumping the machine I would, but I can't. This leaves me in the awkward position of being left out in the cold by the GNU project because of a mistake I can't afford to rectify. Richard will respond, in essence, "Tough luck", and that response is justifiable. The gnu newsgroups however, are in the public domain, and it is not appropriate for us to seek to limit the legitemate expressions of it's users, even if we disagree with their views. Such censorship stands in opposition to everything that FSF stands for. So express your disappointment with Apple and your disagreement with those who are supporting them. But don't threaten those who disagree with you - unless, of course, you think it is okay for them to threaten you... Jon