Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rpi!rpi.edu!tale From: tale@pawl.rpi.edu (David C Lawrence) Newsgroups: gnu.gcc Subject: Re: Apple vs. FSF (THE BOYCOTT IS A FAILURE) Message-ID: Date: 31 May 89 20:53:17 GMT References: <1Rd512#2N2hXM=pst@anise.acc.com> Sender: usenet@rpi.edu Reply-To: tale@pawl.rpi.edu Lines: 15 In-reply-to: pst@anise.acc.com's message of 31 May 89 18:34:51 GMT In <1Rd512#2N2hXM=pst@anise.acc.com> pst@anise.acc.com (Paul Traina) writes: Paul> Claim: Paul> We should stop the boycott NOW. It is time to go back to the Paul> black-board and come back with an alternate plan that will Paul> settle the Apple/Microsoft suit in our favor. Why should we stop the boycott? While I agree that perhaps there coule a better plan of attack and we should investigate it, where does stopping the boycott get us? No where that I can see. If we are going to come up with an alternate plan it certainly does not at this point preclude continuing the boycott. Dave -- (setq mail '("tale@pawl.rpi.edu" "tale@itsgw.rpi.edu" "tale@rpitsmts.bitnet"))