Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!shelby!polya!shap
From: shap@polya.Stanford.EDU (Jonathan S. Shapiro)
Newsgroups: gnu.gcc
Subject: Re: Apple vs. FSF (THE BOYCOTT IS A FAILURE)
Message-ID: <9630@polya.Stanford.EDU>
Date: 1 Jun 89 04:09:41 GMT
References: <1Rd512#2N2hXM=pst@anise.acc.com> <1Rd92D#3CBSgm=pst@anise.acc.com>
Sender: Jonathan S. Shapiro <shap@polya.Stanford.EDU>
Reply-To: shap@polya.Stanford.EDU (Jonathan S. Shapiro)
Organization: Stanford University
Lines: 11

In article <1Rd92D#3CBSgm=pst@anise.acc.com> pst@anise.acc.com (Paul Traina) writes:
>The boycott hurts our peers not Apple.  What we need to do is get
>amnius-curie (friend-of-the-court, and I know I didn't spell it correctly)
>status in the court battle.  We have to convince the judge that there is no
>such thing as a look-and-feel copyright.  This will set legal precedent.
>
This is a very good idea, and I think it is right to the point.  Does
anyone know how to go abuot doing this?  What concrete steps can the
FSF group take to accomplish this?

Jon Shapiro