Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ames!lll-winken!netsys!jsheese!jeffery From: jeffery@jsheese.FIDONET.ORG (Jeff Sheese) Newsgroups: news.admin Subject: Re: List of sites with broken Followup (No References) Software Keywords: g protocol, zmodem Message-ID: <99.2474C600@jsheese.FIDONET.ORG> Date: 20 May 89 01:20:08 GMT References: <318@xdos.UUCP> Reply-To: jeffery@jsheese.Fidonet.ORG Followup-To: news.admin Organization: JStek Enterprises - Frederick, MD Lines: 35 In an article of <19 May 89 14:34:37 GMT>, doug@xdos.UUCP (Doug Merritt) writes: >In article <89.247289F5@jsheese.FIDONET.ORG> jeffery@jsheese.Fidonet.ORG >writes: >>Well, almost. Most Fidonet mail transfer programs are able to use >>Zmodem file transfer which beats the heck out of G protocol. > >Why is it better? > Doug Maybe I'm mis-judging it from the implementation that I'm using, but at 1200 baud I average 92 cps and at 2400 baud I average 190cps. This is whether the connections are local or via PC Pursuit. Of course I can't expect much more using a packet size of 64 bytes. It appears that with G, each packet requires an ACK regardless of the window size. With zmodem the transmission of data from origin to recipient is continuous, where the recipient tells the sender if any problems occur in transmission. Packet size starts at 1024 bytes at 1200 baud (2048 at 2400 baud) and adjust themselves according to line conditions. It even has error recovery on partial transfers. Now I'm not saying one technology is better than another. Since Fidonet software is mainly restricted to one architecture (MSDOS and IBM clones) it has been able to progress to a very secure and reliable technology over the years. The code is not designed to be as portable among different hardware and software systems as Usenet. Maybe that makes it an unfair comparison. -- Jeff Sheese - via FidoNet node 1:109/116 UUCP: ...!netsys!jsheese!jeffery ARPA: jeffery@jsheese.FIDONET.ORG (I am sole owner. My opinions represent my company.) (Send all flames to null@jsheese.Fidonet.ORG)