Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!att!cbnews!military
From: maniac%garnet.Berkeley.EDU@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU (George W. Herbert)
Newsgroups: sci.military
Subject: Re: Northrop F-20...
Summary: err.. small correction...
Message-ID: <6738@cbnews.ATT.COM>
Date: 20 May 89 03:17:09 GMT
Sender: military@cbnews.ATT.COM
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
Lines: 11
Approved: military@att.att.com



From: maniac%garnet.Berkeley.EDU@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU (George W. Herbert)

In article <6593@cbnews.ATT.COM> nak@cbnews.ATT.COM (Neil A. Kirby) writes:
>    I'm surprised that it didn't destroy F5 sales, myself.  It had great
>    price/performance.  If I were running a third world nation, I'd have

_What F-5 sales?  The sales for the last few decades (1975 on?) have been all
retread airframes, not new.  It's been a long time since northrop build
a new tiger II.