Path: utzoo!attcan!ncrcan!moegate!soley From: soley@moegate.UUCP (Norman S. Soley) Newsgroups: can.usrgroup Subject: Re: Meeting Notice Message-ID: <372@moegate.UUCP> Date: 8 Jun 89 10:43:44 GMT References: <248aab57@fricker.uucp> <2176@ubc-cs.UUCP> Reply-To: soley@moegate.UUCP (Norman S. Soley) Distribution: can Organization: Ontario Ministry of the Environment Lines: 38 In article <2176@ubc-cs.UUCP> morrison@grads.cs.ubc.ca (Rick Morrison) writes: > >Now, I have been subscribing (reading would be too generous) to this >group since its inception. I have yet to discern any reason why anything >that appears here would be of any interest to anyone outside of an >apparently small clique of readers in Toronto and near vicinity. > >I suggest that rather that than wasting network resources, nation-wide, >on the sort of idle chatter that predominates here, that this group be >converted to 1 (or more) regional mailing lists. Here! Here! I've never understood why we needed this group in the first place, I refused to newgroup it when I was on ontenv, somehow it slipped through the cracks here. The argument runs something like this: We already have comp.org.usrgroup, and the ability to limit distrubution to can so we don't need it for /usr/group/cdn We already have ont.events for meeting announcements for UU and /usr/group/cdn so we don't need it for that. UU has a mailing list for their internal chatter so we don't need it for that. The traffic in {can,ont,tor}.general is low enough that if there is actually something to be discussed publicly about either of these organizations there's plenty of room for it. So, what do we need can.usrgroup for? OK, I'm about to 'rmgroup -d local can.usrgroup' anybody care to talk me out of it? -- Norman Soley - The Communications Guy - Ontario Ministry of the Environment soley@moegate.UUCP or if you roll your own: uunet!attcan!ncrcan!moegate!soley The Minister speaks for the Ministry, I speak for myself. Got that! Good. Stay smart, go cool, be happy, it's the only way to get what you want