Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ames!purdue!haven!vrdxhq!daitc!daitc.daitc.mil
From: jkrueger@daitc.daitc.mil (Jonathan Krueger)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: Slandering Intel
Message-ID: <539@daitc.daitc.mil>
Date: 9 Jun 89 16:47:07 GMT
References: <182@mipos3.intel.com> <1989Jun2.163144.5197@utzoo.uucp> <1641@softway.oz>
Sender: jkrueger@daitc.daitc.mil
Reply-To: jkrueger@daitc.daitc.mil (Jonathan Krueger)
Organization: DTIC Special Projects Office (DTIC-SPO), Alexandria VA
Lines: 9

In article <1641@softway.oz>, chris@softway (Chris Maltby) writes:
>It's architectures like [the x86] which
>ensure that programmers will never become redundant...

No, just their programs.  How many incompatible ways can YOU work
around an architectural limit?  Answer: too many.

-- Jon
--