Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!apple!sun-barr!decwrl!decvax!ima!compilers-sender
From: yueh@unc.cs.unc.edu (Alan Yueh)
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Subject: Procedure inlining at the source level
Keywords: Optimization, open compilation, inlining, procedure integration
Message-ID: <8399@thorin.cs.unc.edu>
Date: 7 Jun 89 20:46:52 GMT
Sender: compilers-sender@ima.ima.isc.com
Reply-To: yueh@unc.cs.unc.edu (Alan Yueh)
Lines: 21
Approved: compilers@ima.UUCP

I am looking for papers/technical reports/general pointers about the subject
of procedure inlining (also called integration, open compilation, open coding,
etc.) at the source level, and criteria for inlining that produce good
optimizations.

I have found a few papers (old) on the subject, but most are either very
sketchy or are written on the intermediate language transformation level.

I am interested in source-to-source transformations. If anyone has recent
papers on source-to-source transforms (implementation discussion) or recent
analyses of criteria for when to inline, please email.

Apologies if this raises a recent issue; I've just joined this newsgroup.

Thanks, Alan W. Yueh
(yueh@cs.unc.edu)
--
Send compilers articles to compilers@ima.isc.com or, perhaps, Levine@YALE.EDU
Plausible paths are { decvax | harvard | yale | bbn}!ima
Please send responses to the originator of the message -- I cannot forward
mail accidentally sent back to compilers.  Meta-mail to ima!compilers-request