Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!bellcore!texbell!vector!telecom-gateway From: egs@u-word.dallas.tx.us (Eric Schnoebelen) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom Subject: Re: Statewide Uniformity Message-ID: Date: 1 Jun 89 19:21:11 GMT Sender: news@vector.Dallas.TX.US Reply-To: egs@u-word.uucp Organization: John W. Bridges & Associates, Inc., Lewisville, Tx. Lines: 26 Approved: telecom-request@vector.dallas.tx.us X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@vector.dallas.tx.us X-TELECOM-Digest: volume 9, issue 184, message 7 of 11 In article cmoore@brl.mil (VLD/VMB) writes: - X-TELECOM-Digest: volume 9, issue 182, message 3 of 7 - (Did 817 get the same dialing requirements as 214 did when the latter got - N0X/N1X?) Yes. Since Fort Worth is in 817, and Dallas is in 214, and there is a large base of Metro telephone numbers in Dallas/Ft. Worth. Perhaps I should say that Ft. Worth got the same dialing requirements as Dallas ( and I should know, an old girlfriend lives in Ft Worth, and I have a Dallas area Metro number, and we have to use 10 digit dialing ) As for statewide uniformity, I don't think that is currently in place in Texas, except the regions around Dallas/Ft. Worth, and Houston, and remember that Texas (currently) has seven (7) NPA's ( which seven is left as an exercise to the reader :-) -- Eric Schnoebelen, JBA Incorporated, Lewisville, Tx. egs@u-word.dallas.tx.us ...!killer!u-word!egs Real Programmers: Real Programmers have trouble suppressing homicidal tendencies when asked, "Are you sure?"