Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!mcnc!spl
From: spl@mcnc.org (Steve Lamont)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: typedefing arrays
Keywords: kludge hack bogus
Message-ID: <4643@alvin.mcnc.org>
Date: 6 Jun 89 01:38:04 GMT
References: <4636@alvin.mcnc.org> <Jun.5.17.50.31.1989.803@math.rutgers.edu>
Reply-To: spl@mcnc.org.UUCP (Steve Lamont)
Organization: Microelectronics Center of NC; RTP, NC
Lines: 28

In article <Jun.5.17.50.31.1989.803@math.rutgers.edu> bumby@math.rutgers.edu (Richard Bumby) writes:
<In article <4636@alvin.mcnc.org> spl@mcnc.org (Steve Lamont) writes:
<
<> Gentlefolk:
<> 
<> 		    . . . <stuff omitted> . . .
<>
<>   Now to the nub of my question:
<> 
<>   Is it possible to do something like
<> 
<> 	typedef int	vertex[3];
<
<  [question with obvious answer omitted]
<It seems like good C to me.
<-- 
<
Thanks to
<--R. T. Bumby ** Math ** Rutgers ** New Brunswick **
and Doug Gwyn (I think, my apologies if I got the name wrong) for
enlightenment.  My problem was not thinking pointer!


-- 
							spl
Steve Lamont, sciViGuy			EMail:	spl@ncsc.org
North Carolina Supercomputing Center	Phone: (919) 248-1120
Box 12732/RTP, NC 27709