Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!think!redsox!campbell
From: campbell@redsox.bsw.com (Larry Campbell)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Moderated C group ? (was Re: Posting)
Message-ID: <774@redsox.bsw.com>
Date: 7 Jun 89 11:06:38 GMT
References: <1989May23.030223.24871@utzoo.uucp> <929@maestro.htsa.aha.nl> <13410@haddock.ima.isc.com> <934@maestro.htsa.aha.nl> <18230@unix.cis.pittsburgh.edu> <13607@haddock.ima.isc.com>
Reply-To: campbell@redsox.UUCP (Larry Campbell)
Organization: The Boston Software Works, Inc.
Lines: 14

In article <13607@haddock.ima.isc.com> karl@haddock.ima.isc.com (Karl Heuer) writes:

-So, let's draw up a charter: The moderator shall not reject a question for
-being "stupid".  He/she may reject an *answer* for being wrong ("int is always
-32 bits") or redundant (the 25th consecutive posting saying "no it isn't"), or
-any posting for being inappropriate ("How do you pronounce `#'?").  Does this
-sound reasonable?

Top on my list of "inappropriate" questions would be "So how come C is case
sensitive?"
-- 
Larry Campbell                          The Boston Software Works, Inc.
campbell@bsw.com                        120 Fulton Street
wjh12!redsox!campbell                   Boston, MA 02146