Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!rutgers!psuvax1!flee From: flee@shire.cs.psu.edu (Felix Lee) Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Moderated C group ? (was Re: Posting) Message-ID: Date: 8 Jun 89 21:29:25 GMT References: <1989May23.030223.24871@utzoo.uucp> <929@maestro.htsa.aha.nl> <13410@haddock.ima.isc.com> <934@maestro.htsa.aha.nl> <18230@unix.cis.pittsburgh.edu> <13607@haddock.ima.isc.com> <890@m3.mfci.UUCP> Sender: news@psuvax1.cs.psu.edu Organization: Penn State University Computer Science Lines: 12 In-reply-to: karzes@mfci.UUCP's message of 8 Jun 89 00:01:24 GMT In article <890@m3.mfci.UUCP>, karzes@mfci.UUCP (Tom Karzes) writes: >I question the ability of a moderator to reject an *answer* for being >wrong. The key is the time delay. Presumably, the moderator will get a handful of different replies in the same timeslice, from which he/she can read and weed out the repetitive and wrong. Rather than having postings instantaneously blatted out from the fingers to the newsgroup without intervening thought. -- Felix Lee flee@shire.cs.psu.edu *!psuvax1!shire!flee