Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!pasteur!ames!amdahl!terry From: terry@uts.amdahl.com (Lewis T. Flynn) Newsgroups: comp.lang.rexx Subject: Re: UNIX REXX makes sense Message-ID: Date: 7 Jun 89 16:36:09 GMT References: <7800001@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> Reply-To: terry@amdahl.uts.amdahl.com (Lewis T. Flynn) Organization: Amdahl Corporation, Sunnyvale CA Lines: 17 In article <7800001@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> phil@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu writes: > >A UNIX version of REXX would make sense. It may not be everyone's favorite >language, but it does have some powerful capabilities. [suggestions deleted] >Does some wizard of writer of language interpreter want to tackle this one? > >--Phil howard-- I've been trying to convince Charles Daney (the author of Personal REXX from Mansfield Software) to do just that. So far, he's unconvinced that there is a big enough market to do a UNIX port. Any ideas of how many he might sell at a reasonable price (the ms-dos version lists for $125)? Terry Flynn #include