Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!agate!shelby!portia!forel!karish
From: karish@forel.stanford.edu (Chuck Karish)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp
Subject: Re: how to fix rn return addresses
Summary: Think before you rip out Reply-To:
Message-ID: <2903@portia.Stanford.EDU>
Date: 11 Jun 89 20:26:00 GMT
References: <7912@saturn.ucsc.edu> <WISNER.89Jun11122624@anableps.berkeley.edu>
Sender: USENET News System <news@Portia.stanford.edu>
Reply-To: karish@forel.stanford.edu (Chuck Karish)
Organization: When necessary
Lines: 17

In article <WISNER.89Jun11122624@anableps.berkeley.edu> wisner@mica.Berkeley.EDU (Bill Wisner) wrote:
>Go through all the rn source code and change all references to .UUCP to
>.whateveryourdomainis.

It's not very difficult.  There aren't many of them.

>Alternate, preferable, fix: rip out the Reply-To: code altogether. I'm
>in full agreement with ulmo here.

Not acceptable for NNTP-only leaf nodes, like the one I'm typing
to now (forel.stanford.edu).  Mail to karish@portia.stanford.edu is
guaranteed to bounce.

The proper domain name should be set by the installation script.

	Chuck Karish		{decwrl,hpda}!mindcrf!karish
	(415) 493-7277		karish@forel.stanford.edu