Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!unmvax!gatech!udel!mmdf
From: "kosma@ALAN.LAAC-AI.Dialnet.Symbolics.COM"@alan.kahuna.decnet.lockheed.com
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: QMouse vs. MachII
Message-ID: <17011@louie.udel.EDU>
Date: 6 Jun 89 18:30:41 GMT
Sender: mmdf@udel.EDU
Lines: 20

Received: from BLAISE.LAAC-AI.Dialnet.Symbolics.COM by ALAN.LAAC-AI.Dialnet.Symbolics.COM via CHAOS with CHAOS-MAIL id 24499; Mon 5-Jun-89 14:43:41 PDT
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 89 14:43 PDT
From: Montgomery Kosma <kosma@ALAN.LAAC-AI.Dialnet.Symbolics.COM>
Subject: QMouse vs. MachII
To: "eagle::amiga-relay%udel.edu"@KAHUNA.LAAC-AI.Dialnet.Symbolics.COM
In-Reply-To: Your message of 5 Jun 89 14:31 PDT
Message-ID: <19890605214316.2.KOSMA@BLAISE.LAAC-AI.Dialnet.Symbolics.COM>
 
There's been lots of talk about QMouse lately on the net.  I've been
using MachII, but I was wondering how these two programs compare.  Seem
pretty similar from what I've heard.  I know Mach provides a menu-driven
program to modify its options; does Qmouse?  I'd appreciate anybody
who's used both of these programs to post/EMail a comparison.
 
Thanks in advance!
 
monty kosma
 
le03472%portal.decnet.lockheed.com@austin.lockheed.com