Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!deimos.cis.ksu.edu!unmvax!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!ut-emx!mjl
From: mjl@ut-emx.UUCP (Donald A Kassebaum)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Which Modem?
Message-ID: <13910@ut-emx.UUCP>
Date: 10 Jun 89 07:04:11 GMT
References: <52124@aerospace.AERO.ORG> <19002@cup.portal.com>
Reply-To: mjl@emx.UUCP (Maurice LeBrun)
Organization: UTexas Computation Center, Austin, Texas
Lines: 16

In article <19002@cup.portal.com> morris-ng@cup.portal.com (Yuklung Morris Ng) writes:
>
>   Don't get Avatex (the one which isn't Hayes compatible at all).  Because it
>is cheap (in the performance wise).

Au contraire.  The Avatex 2400 is a fine modem which I would heartily
recommend.  It claims to be completely Hayes compatible, and I have never
seen evidence to the contrary (their original 1200, however, was not
completely compatible).  I've had mine for almost a year now; I actually
saw a _decrease_ in line noise when I got it (to almost none) and am
very happy with it.  It also _looks_ nice :-).

Maurice LeBrun                |   "So then I says to Borg, `You know,
Institute for Fusion Studies  |  as long as we're under siege, one of us
University of Texas at Austin |    oughta moon these Saxon dogs.'"
mjl@fusion.ph.utexas.edu)     |                                (Far Side)