Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ncar!tank!arxt
From: arxt@tank.uchicago.edu (patrick  palmer)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Which Modem?
Keywords: modem, Avatex
Message-ID: <3771@tank.uchicago.edu>
Date: 10 Jun 89 22:47:06 GMT
References: <52124@aerospace.AERO.ORG> <19002@cup.portal.com> <13910@ut-emx.UUCP>
Reply-To: arxt@tank.uchicago.edu (patrick  palmer)
Organization: University of Chicago
Lines: 14

In article <13910@ut-emx.UUCP> mjl@emx.UUCP (Maurice LeBrun) writes:
>In article <19002@cup.portal.com> morris-ng@cup.portal.com (Yuklung Morris Ng) writes:
>>
>>   Don't get Avatex (the one which isn't Hayes compatible at all).  Because..
>
>Au contraire.  The Avatex 2400 is a fine modem which I would heartily
>recommend.  It claims to be completely Hayes compatible, and I have never
>seen evidence to the contrary (their original 1200, however, was not
>completely compatible).  I've had mine for almost a year now; I actually

One minor, but hopefully clarifying, addition: Avatex made 2 1200 baud modems.
One was not Hayes compatible (Avatex 1200), but the other was (Avatex 1200h/c).
I don't know why.  What its worth, I have an Avatex 1200 and a Supra 2400, and
have been happy with both.