Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!apple!bloom-beacon!usc!csun!solaria!ecphssrw@robin.csun.edu
From: ecphssrw@robin.csun.edu (Stephen Walton)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Manx update to v3.6a
Message-ID: <760@solaria.csun.edu>
Date: 12 Jun 89 01:00:57 GMT
References: <3286@m2-net.UUCP> <2298@pur-phy> <708@cbnewsm.ATT.COM>
Sender: ecphssrw@solaria.csun.edu
Reply-To: ecphssrw@robin.csun.edu (Stephen Walton)
Organization: California State Univ., Northridge
Lines: 12
In-reply-to: nsw@cbnewsm.ATT.COM (Neil Weinstock)

In all fairness to Manx, it is still true that, according to TransAmi
V2 #1, Manx 3.6a compiles A68K in 8 minutes 22 seconds compared with
10:01 for Lattice 5.02 normal and 46:21 (!!) for Lattice with the
global optimizer on.

No wonder Dave Haynie said that Lattice C++ would only be real usable
on an A2620 machine with a fast hard disk...That said, if Manx 5.0 slips
any further, I'll be switching too.
--
Stephen Walton, Dept. of Physics & Astronomy, Cal State Univ. Northridge
RCKG01M@CALSTATE.BITNET       ecphssrw@afws.csun.edu
swalton@solar.stanford.edu    ...!csun!afws.csun.edu!ecphssrw