Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!att!mcdchg!mcdphx!teroach.UUCP!dbk
From: dbk@teroach.UUCP (Dave Kinzer)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Subject: Re: Virtual Memory / doable 1.4 request
Summary: Words from another newsfroop
Keywords: VM,Virtual,Memory
Message-ID: <11001@mcdphx.phx.mcd.mot.com>
Date: 3 Jun 89 15:07:37 GMT
References: <8905200449.AA20664@postgres.Berkeley.EDU> <3856@sugar.hackercorp.com> <3859@sugar.hackercorp.com> <3877@sugar.hackercorp.com>
Sender: listen@mcdphx.phx.mcd.mot.com
Reply-To: dbk@teroach.UUCP (Dave Kinzer)
Followup-To: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Distribution: na
Organization: Motorola Microcomputer Division, Tempe, Az.
Lines: 9


   Just saw someone over in the Macincrash group complaining that he
believed the upcoming virtual memory was going to wear out his hard
disk faster.  There's no pleasing everybody, is there?  ;-)


|    // GOATS - Gladly Offering All Their Support  Dave Kinzer (602)897-3085|
|   //  >> In Hell you need 4Mb to Multitask!  <<  uunet!mcdphx!teroach!dbk |
| \X/   #define policy_maker(name) (name->salary > 3 * dave.salary)         |