Path: utzoo!censor!geac!jtsv16!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!pro-beagle.cts.com!mmunz
From: mmunz@pro-beagle.cts.com (Mark Munz)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple
Subject: Re: Pcode(sort of) and Higher education
Message-ID: <8906110816.AA28640@crash.cts.com>
Date: 11 Jun 89 04:00:31 GMT
Reply-To: pnet01!pro-beagle!mmunz@nosc.mil
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 14

Network Comment: to #8579 by pnet01!crash!uicvm.uic.edu!MSER001%ECNCDC.BITNET

> Pascal and C

Actually, they're not all that different.  I'm a big Pascal fan (mainly
because that's what I used when learning structured programming). C is a bit
harder to read because it uses more symbols and words (ie. { } vs BEGIN,END)

If you do it right, C can look pretty structured (at least the source I've
seen from fellow programmers looks readable).

If you have a Pascal that lets you use Assembly right in the source (which
kills any portability :-) -- then it can probably do everything C can... well,
almost everything..