Xref: utzoo news.groups:9998 comp.sys.att:6621 unix-pc.general:3005
Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!sun-barr!sun!imagen!atari!portal!cup.portal.com!thad
From: thad@cup.portal.com (Thad P Floryan)
Newsgroups: news.groups,comp.sys.att,unix-pc.general
Subject: Re: A new group "unix-pc.x"
Message-ID: <19155@cup.portal.com>
Date: 6 Jun 89 04:42:13 GMT
References: <533@uncle.UUCP>
Organization: The Portal System (TM)
Lines: 17

Re: "unix-pc.x", you're kidding, right?  This *IS* June and not April 1?!

The *H*U*M*O*N*G*O*U*S* and overwhelming volume of some 30-40 postings a
week to unix-pc.general warrants another splinter?  S-u-u-u-r-e .... :-)

In *MY* opinion, the present unix-pc.general, unix-pc.bugs and unix-pc.uucp
should be consolidated into the original unix-pc.general (based on the
underwhelming volume of postings) just to maintain cohesiveness.  Seriously.

The present unix-pc.general contains material relating to my discovery of
AT&T's file death-bomb (re: /usr/lib/uucp/uudemon.day) to SCSI to HDs to
everything else of interest to the UNIXPC community.  Why make it more
difficult to communicate with kindred souls?

You asked for opinions: mine is AGAINST forming unix-pc.x

Thad Floryan [ thad@cup.portal.com (OR)  ..!sun!portal!cup.portal.com!thad ]