Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!hplabs!hpfcdc!rml
From: rml@hpfcdc.HP.COM (Bob Lenk)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.hp
Subject: Re: Weird bdf response
Message-ID: <5570205@hpfcdc.HP.COM>
Date: 6 Jun 89 20:05:48 GMT
References: <561@mmlai.UUCP>
Organization: HP Ft. Collins, Co.
Lines: 19

> Try deleting the cnode's /dev/dsk/ directory.

I think that is sufficient but not necessary.  All that appears to be
necessary is to avoid any name collisions between device files on the
client and those naming mounted file systems on the server.  Thus the
case of the posted output, the device file on the client could be named
anything other than /dev/dsk/[012]s0.

Another workaround is to use remsh to execute bdf on the server.

> While I'm on the topic, anybody at HP know when you will be able to
> put a user disk on a satellite node?

This is being considered for a future release, but there are no
committed plans yet.

		Bob Lenk
		rml@hpfcla.hp.com
		hplabs!hpfcla!rml