Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!uxc!uxc.cso.uiuc.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!uxe.cso.uiuc.edu!mcdonald
From: mcdonald@uxe.cso.uiuc.edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: 80286, 80386 LOADALL instructions.
Message-ID: <45900241@uxe.cso.uiuc.edu>
Date: 7 Jun 89 16:02:00 GMT
References: <30105@conexch.UUCP>
Lines: 15
Nf-ID: #R:conexch.UUCP:30105:uxe.cso.uiuc.edu:45900241:000:621
Nf-From: uxe.cso.uiuc.edu!mcdonald    Jun  7 11:02:00 1989



>Incidentally, I published full details on the 286 loadall in the Oct. 87
>issue of Microprocessor Report.  I'm working on a 386 LOADALL article, and
>would appreciate any input users may have.  As I said above, my 
>understanding at this point is that it should not be used, but I think
>programmers should be able to make their own decisions.  Also, if Intel
>gives the info to some companies and not others, it creates an unfair
>situation.
            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Sounds like legal action might be in order. I.e. "unfair situation"
might  be "restraint of trade".

Triple damages anybody?