Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!sun-barr!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!purdue!gatech!udel!burdvax!dvnspc1!gary
From: gary@dvnspc1.Dev.Unisys.COM (Gary Barrett)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: World's best word processor
Summary: WordPerfect
Message-ID: <623@dvnspc1.Dev.Unisys.COM>
Date: 9 Jun 89 20:02:28 GMT
References: <25325@agate.BERKELEY.EDU>
Organization: Unisys Corporation, Devon, PA
Lines: 10

In article <25325@agate.BERKELEY.EDU>, marquis@qal.qal.berkeley.edu (Roger Marquis) writes:
> ]]The key mapping is certainly non-intuitive, but you really only have to
> "N". Is there any logic behind this? I vote for WP as the most counter-
> intuitively designed word processor on the market (aside from Edlin
> perhaps). Doesn't anyone from WP read the net?
> 

I am very glad to see that I'm not the only one who scratches his/her
head over WP's human interface.  I just cannot fathom what has made WP
designers choose some of the key sequences they have.