Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!apple!ames!elroy!usc!hacgate!ashtate!dbase!awd
From: awd@dbase.UUCP (Alastair Dallas)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Pascal vs. C vs. Object programming
Summary: Stick with Pascal
Message-ID: <91@dbase.UUCP>
Date: 3 Jun 89 21:55:46 GMT
References: <2292@thor.acc.stolaf.edu>
Distribution: usa
Organization: Ashton Tate Devlopment Center Glendale, Calif.
Lines: 23


In my opinion, you should stick with Pascal.  I am a C programmer who had
to learn to read Pascal to learn the toolbox, so I don't much like Pascal
and I do my work in C.  However, you could easily spend a summer learning
the toolbox and learning C is another task altogether.  Since much of the
available literature (particularly Inside Macintosh) uses Pascal examples,
you can concentrate on the toolbox itself.  When I was a young man (<sigh>)
I would often (and still do) cast about in several directions at once.
However, a solid appreciation of the toolbox will stand you in good stead
for years to come.  You can learn C or C++ next year.

BTW, I can heartily recommend Chernicoff's two books on the toolbox (with
Pascal examples) and Knaster's two books, as well, for other things.
And if THINK's LightSpeed C is any indication, THINK's LightSpeed Pascal
would be fine tool for your needs (although I hear good things about 
Turbo Pascal, as well).

That's my sage advice for today.

/alastair/

Disclaimer: My employers have never heard of Pascal.