Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!decwrl!shelby!polya!ali
From: ali@polya.Stanford.EDU (Ali T. Ozer)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next
Subject: Re: Security and defaults.
Message-ID: <9863@polya.Stanford.EDU>
Date: 9 Jun 89 18:24:51 GMT
References: <4985@umd5.umd.edu> <43b721a8.19ac2@wasp.engin.umich.edu> <5169@pt.cs.cmu.edu> <51575@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu>
Sender: Ali T. Ozer <ali@polya.Stanford.EDU>
Reply-To: aozer@NeXT.com (Ali Ozer)
Distribution: na
Organization: .
Lines: 16

In article <51575@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu> J Greely writes:
 >  While I'm on the subject, who is (are) the anonymous entity
 >(entities) who handle initial responses to bug reports?  I understand
 >the desire to have all responses directed to the central mailbox, but
 >when replying to a reply to a bug report I like to feel that I'm
 >talking to a person.  When I'm writing to someone who goes by the name
 >of "NeXT Technical Services Bug Reporting", I feel like I'm yelling at
 >a wall.  I've thought about formally suggesting that the reply
 >software be hacked to include the person's name, while leaving the
 >address pointed at the group.  Comments?

Please be assured that there are real human entities behind that alias. 8-)
I've forwarded your suggestion to the group.

Ali Ozer, NeXT Developer Support 
aozer@NeXT.com