Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!uwvax!tank!uxc!uxc.cso.uiuc.edu!m.cs.uiuc.edu!s.cs.uiuc.edu!carroll From: carroll@s.cs.uiuc.edu Newsgroups: comp.unix.wizards Subject: Re: GNU, security, and RMS Message-ID: <216100012@s.cs.uiuc.edu> Date: 4 Jun 89 18:32:00 GMT References: <2322@thor.acc.stolaf.edu> Lines: 27 Nf-ID: #R:thor.acc.stolaf.edu:2322:s.cs.uiuc.edu:216100012:000:1640 Nf-From: s.cs.uiuc.edu!carroll Jun 4 13:32:00 1989 /* Written 1:55 pm Jun 3, 1989 by haynes@ucbarpa.Berkeley.EDU in s.cs.uiuc.edu:comp.unix.wizards */ In article <2322@thor.acc.stolaf.edu> mike@stolaf.edu writes: >(2) There should not be security among the users of a computer system. Well, you have a right to your opinion; but a corollary of this belief is that all the users of a computer system have to be mutually friendly and responsible and trust one another. ^^^^^^^^^^^ /* End of text from s.cs.uiuc.edu:comp.unix.wizards */ Put with "skillful" with "responsible". I used to share a couple systems with some associates of mine, all of whom I trusted complete to be _honest_ and _ethical_. I certainly did _not_ trust all of them to be _skillful_. As an example, I have a friend who I'd trust in my house while I'm gone, but I'd _never_ loan him the keys to my car because _he doesn't know how to drive_. Similarly, I didnt' give my some of my associates full priviledges because _they didn't know enough to be safe_. If ever one was a wizard kernel-hacker, then it wouldn't be a problem. But that doesn't happen in the real world. Properly used security also prevents _accidents_. Further, I kept private information on the system - I trusted them not to look, even with root priviledges, if I set the permissions to exclude normal logons. Setting everything 666 (or 777) strikes me as bogus. How are others to know what they are welcome to look at / edit or not? Alan M. Carroll "And there you are carroll@s.cs.uiuc.edu Saying 'We have the Moon, so now the Stars...'" CS Grad / U of Ill @ Urbana ...{ucbvax,pur-ee,convex}!s.cs.uiuc.edu!carroll