Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!egvideo!edhew
From: edhew@egvideo.UUCP (Ed Hew)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix
Subject: Re: SCO Unix 3.2 <-?-> comp.unix.xenix
Keywords: SCO, XENIX, UNIX, 3.2
Message-ID: <2034@egvideo.UUCP>
Date: 8 Jun 89 04:00:00 GMT
References: <184@usource.UUCP> <18698@cup.portal.com> <2022@egvideo.UUCP> <193@icdi10.UUCP>
Reply-To: edhew@egvideo.UUCP (Ed Hew)
Followup-To: comp.unix.xenix
Distribution: na
Organization: A Box in the Basement, Kitchener, Ontario, Canada
Lines: 23

In article <193@icdi10.UUCP> fr@icdi10.UUCP (Fred Rump from home) writes:
>This does not check with the facts as I know them.
>My assumption is that the 286 Xenix version will stay but that on the 386 
>side it will simply go away and turn into SCO UNIX 386.
>
>Am I wrong? I don't think SCO will support two 386 Unixes. I wouldn't.
>
>Fred Rump

I had written:

EH>On the other hand, SCO UNIX appears to be directed towards sites which
EH>require AT&T based UNIX, full binary portability, C2 level audit security,
EH>We have two very good products here, but they're directed towards different
EH>markets ("authorized comments" are welcome).
>
>This does not check with the facts as I know them.

It's still my understanding that SCO will continue to support Xenix for
an indefinite time.  I have requested "official" (well, from SCO marketing)
clarification of this, and will post accordingly when they advise.

		--ed		{edhew@egvideo.uucp}