Xref: utzoo gnu.emacs:997 comp.emacs:6195
Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!uunet!husc6!rutgers!njin!princeton!phoenix!eliot
From: eliot@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Eliot Handelman)
Newsgroups: gnu.emacs,comp.emacs
Subject: Emacs under Common Lisp?
Message-ID: <8856@phoenix.Princeton.EDU>
Date: 2 Jun 89 07:04:39 GMT
Reply-To: eliot@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Eliot Handelman)
Followup-To: gnu.emacs
Organization: Princeton University, NJ
Lines: 8

Here's a matter that I've wondered about. Why not get rid of emacslisp 
altogether and replace it with a full common lisp? I use emacs for Lisp
program development, and I think it's very good: but I really don't see why
there should be two separate lisp processes running when there is an obvious 
possibility for a fully integrated enviroment, which much better communication
between the editor and the lisp process.

Comments?