Xref: utzoo news.groups:10051 news.admin:5917 Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!apple!ames!ncar!woods From: woods@ncar.ucar.edu (Greg Woods) Newsgroups: news.groups,news.admin Subject: moderated "newsgroups" group Message-ID: <3400@ncar.ucar.edu> Date: 9 Jun 89 23:08:22 GMT Reply-To: woods@ncar.UCAR.EDU (Greg Woods) Organization: Scientific Computing Division/NCAR, Boulder CO Lines: 61 [I am going to be at the USENIX conference next week, so I won't be able to reply to any articles or mailed comments until June 19] This is, at this point, what I am leaning towards calling a vote on. It lists the major issues and how the net SEEMS to be leaning. 1) Should we have a moderated group in which to post new group proposals, official calls for votes, and voting results? The consensus is very clear that such a group would be desireable. 2) Make news.groups moderated and create a new unmoderated group, or create a new moderated group and leave news.groups unmoderated? This is not as clear, but most of the comments I have seen favor leaving news.groups alone and creating a new, moderated group. 3) What to call the new group? news.groups.proposals and news.announce.groups seem to be the favored names. After reading all the comments, I tend to favor news.announce.groups, as news.announce is traditionally where these kinds of groups go. There is some merit to the idea that it should be a subgroup of news.groups, but more people seem to be suggesting news.announce.groups. I confess I hadn't thought of putting the group under news.announce; who says the discussion never accomplishes anything?! 4) Who should be the moderator? Other than myself, I haven't seen any formal suggestions for alternatives, and I have seen (to me) surprisingly little objection to the idea of me moderating the group. So, I propose that I be the moderator. Remember that if the net doesn't like the job I do, we can always go back to the old situation where everything gets posted in the (still unmoderated) news.groups. I plan to have a backup moderator who will take over when I am gone for more than a few days at a time. I don't know who that would be yet. 5) (The fun part) How much moderating should I do? I don't plan to reject proposals based on the merit of the proposal, but I see no harm in doing some rather obvious filtering, such as if someone suggests that we create a rec.football to discuss the NFL, I will point out that we already have a rec.sport.football for that purpose, and save the poor soul from getting flamed to a crisp :-) If someone proposes something that has been shot down several times in the past (e.g. rec.music.rock) I might point that out and ask if they still want to try anyway. If they say yes, it gets posted, period. I would also ensure that the newsgroup creation guidelines are being followed (i.e. I won't post a call for votes 2 days after the proposal, I will ensure that they wait the required 2 weeks). Other than for violation of the guidelines or not within the group's charter (i.e. not a new group proposal, call for votes, or vote result), I will *always* post an article after one iteration, meaning that if I send a message back to the poster, and they respond that they still want to post it anyway, it gets posted. I will note this fact in an editorial remark at the beginning of the article, so everyone on the net will know what kinds of proposals are getting questioned. If the article is cross-posted to any other groups, including but not limited to news.groups, I will cross-post it to those groups when I send it out. I will read any discussion generated by this article when I return from USENIX, and also any comments mailed to me. Then the required time will have passed and I will post a formal call for votes on this proposal, possibly modified as a result of comments I see. It will be very interesting to see the results of the vote. I suspect we will see many more votes cast than normal. --greg