Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!kddlab!titcca!sragwa!wsgw!socslgw!diamond!diamond
From: diamond@diamond.csl.sony.junet (Norman Diamond)
Newsgroups: news.misc
Subject: Re: IN MODERATION NETWORK and Communication Services Announcement.
Message-ID: <10340@socslgw.csl.sony.JUNET>
Date: 8 Jun 89 02:45:11 GMT
References: <1097@fernwood.MPK.CA.US> <274@spies.UUCP>
Sender: news@csl.sony.JUNET
Reply-To: diamond@csl.sony.junet (Norman Diamond)
Organization: Sony Computer Science Laboratory Inc., Tokyo, Japan
Lines: 23

In article <1097@fernwood.MPK.CA.US> geoff@Fernwood.MPK.CA.US (Geoff Goodfellow) writes:

>>ANTERIOR TECHNOLOGY TO OFFER NEW COMMUNICATIONS AND INFORMATION SERVICES
>>     MENLO PARK, Calif. -- June 5, 1989 -- Anterior Technology today 
>>introduced the IN MODERATION NETWORK(TM) and related communications services.  

In article <274@spies.UUCP> arubin@spies.UUCP (Andy Rubin) writes:

>[gobs and gobs deleted]

Yup, that message sure was not posted in moderation.

>So, what you're REALLY trying to say is that you censor network messages.
>Ask yourself this:  Would the IN MODERATION NETWORK censor this type of message?
>Probally.  Wanna know why?  Because it's an advertisement by a for-profit
>organization, cross-posted to the wrong newsgroups (try biz.*) offering a service
>for a fee.

Also because of its immoderate length?
--
Norman Diamond, Sony Computer Science Lab (diamond%csl.sony.co.jp@relay.cs.net)
 The above opinions are my own.  However, if you see this at Waterloo, Stanford,
 or Anterior, then their administrators must have approved of these opinions.