Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!hplabs!hp-pcd!hplsla!tomb From: tomb@hplsla.HP.COM (Tom Bruhns) Newsgroups: sci.electronics Subject: Re: direction finder Message-ID: <5170037@hplsla.HP.COM> Date: 2 Jun 89 15:25:59 GMT References: <11269@megaron.arizona.edu> Organization: HP Lake Stevens, WA Lines: 39 prem@crackle.amd.com (Prem Sobel) writes: >In article <11269@megaron.arizona.edu> wendt@arizona.edu (Alan Lee Wendt) writes: >>I'd like to build a direction finder that my wife (who's blind) >>can use to find the house. Something with a range of 2 miles or >>so, that could be left on all the time at the house and a small >>battery-operated hand buzzer that would stop buzzing when lined >>up with the direction of the house. >> >>Help me get my wife her instrument license. What frequencies >>are available for this kind of use? Anybody have any designs >>for bits of this? > >Since city blocks are not radial, it might be useful for there to also >be an audible distance measurement, but that is VERY expensive. For >direction a system similar to the aircraft VOR system might be useful >(again unfortunately very expensive), which sends an omnidirectional >radio pulse out at the same time it uses a phased array to sweep a >beam around at a known rate. The receiver measure the time between the >omnnidirectional and swept beam to give angle to transmitter. But VOR gives more information than requested: the person does not need to know that she is N, S, E, or W of the house, only in which direction the house is. That's easier. If you have a beacon transmitter at the house and a receiver with an antenna with a single sharp null (cardiod pattern), you have what the original poster wants. I have no idea about frequencies, etc. How about calling your local FCC field office? There have been some articles in ham magazines on direction-finding within the last couple years that might be useful; try _Ham_Radio_ magazine and QST. I recall an article on the "Double Duckie" antenna that has a sharp null - but the null is in two directions. Even so, it's fairly easy to resolve the ambiguity. By nature of its operation, the antenna puts essentially FM modulation on a CW signal, so you could broadcast a CW sig and she could hear the modulation and turn the antenna to null it... > >If power levels are below a certain level (100 milliwatts I believe) >or the signal is on on certain allowable experimental frequencies >(above VHF) then no license is needed. >----------