Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!daemon From: rao@brillig.umd.edu (Subbarao Kambhampati) Newsgroups: soc.feminism Subject: A note on Central Park Rape incident and NJ incident Message-ID: <17894@mimsy.UUCP> Date: 5 Jun 89 22:48:53 GMT References: <11844@bloom-beacon.MIT.EDU> Sender: ambar@bloom-beacon.MIT.EDU Reply-To: rao@brillig.umd.edu.UUCP (Subbarao Kambhampati) Organization: U of Maryland, Dept. of Computer Science, Lines: 41 Approved: ambar@bloom-beacon.mit.edu Hi, This is in reference to the media coverage and mass reactions to the central park rape incident. I was surprised and saddened at the quick rate at which it got snow-balled into a "racial" incident, totally masking the essential nature of the incident viz, violence of a group of men against a woman, with total disregard to sanctity of the woman's life (in all senses). I was very saddened to see that only one article in the main-stream media (an article in Time magazine) noted this mis-representation and neglect of deeper issues concerning the crime. That the disease knows no boundaries of black-white/rich-poor demarcations was amply shown by the NJ incident involving the teeanagers from affluent backgrounds and a mentally retarded girl. The real answer to these crimes, I think, can not be found entirely in the motives of the individuals in those specific cases, and has to be attributed in a significant measure to the media portrayal of male-female relationships. [Time magazine article points out how for a significant number of high-school teenagers, their first exposure to sex is through its portrayal in "slasher genre" movies, and how it can possibly distort their sense of values. The standard arguments in defense of this genere, such as "there is a distinction between fantasy and reality" may not even hold when the subjects are in their formative years and may not have been given a fair representation of the "healthy" side of male-female relationships. Couple this with the essentially male-dominated nature of the present day society and what type of picture do you think we are giving those in formative years???.] It is not surprising that an adolescent has hormonal "urges"--It is however surprising that they would go to the extent of violence against fellow humans to satisfy those needs! I don't believe that it is just an extreme form of natural reaction--instead I think it is partly a reflection on the societal conditioning that these people go through. I think, we have to seriously examine what it is in the portrayal of women and men in the media that gives a teen-ager a "sex-centered" and "self-gratification oriented" view of the world and a conviction that they can pursue violent means to achieve those ends. I know this posting is not very constructive in the sense of offering answers to the perceived problems--part of the raison d' etre for it is a desire to grope for just such answers.. Comments? -rao [Subbarao Kambhampati]