Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!twwells!bill
From: bill@twwells.com (T. William Wells)
Newsgroups: alt.sources.d
Subject: Re: TILE FORTH RELEASE
Message-ID: <1989Dec21.003803.9031@twwells.com>
Date: 21 Dec 89 00:38:03 GMT
References: <1512@massormetrix.ida.liu.se> <15023@bfmny0.UU.NET>
Organization: None, Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Lines: 24

In article <15023@bfmny0.UU.NET> tneff@bfmny0.UU.NET (Tom Neff) writes:
: also since it's UNREASONABLE to expect Usenet FORTH enthusiasts to be
: subscribed to comp.lang.forth (right?) we'll crosspost it to alt.sources!

Wrong premise, wrong conclusion. I'm no forth enthusiast. But I'll
keep the Forth posting. Why? Because I *study* things like that.
But there is NO WAY I'll subscribe to any of several dozen MORE
groups just on the off chance that someone will post something
useful.

Oh yes, a friend of mine I was talking to yesterday said
essentially the same thing....

: OK Ed Vielmetti I take it all back.  There IS something worse than
: re-posting 30k source postings from other groups.... :-(

Yes indeed. Your drivel on this subject.

I have *already* benefitted from Ed's work. I have *not*
benefitted from your whining.

---
Bill                    { uunet | novavax | ankh | sunvice } !twwells!bill
bill@twwells.com