Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!rex!ames!pasteur!ladkin@icsib
From: ladkin@icsib (Peter Ladkin)
Newsgroups: comp.ai
Subject: Re: Can humans "understand" mathematics
Message-ID: <20778@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU>
Date: 17 Dec 89 16:59:46 GMT
References: <3120@uceng.uc.edu> <130200002@peg>
Sender: news@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU
Reply-To: ladkin@icsib (Peter Ladkin)
Organization: International Computer Science Institute
Lines: 9
In-reply-to: ggast@peg.UUCP

In article <130200002@peg>, ggast@peg writes:
>    I agree entirely that Searle is missing something.Everyone who has 
>    learnt  a foreign language will know immediately what I  mean.

i'm quite sure that searle is aware of most of these obvious points, and
has answered them. it seems appropriate, before deciding what potential
weaknesses his arguments have, to ask him about them.

peter ladkin