Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!obiwan!keith From: keith@mips.COM (Keith Garrett) Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: Japanese Josephson breakthrough? Implications? Message-ID: <33896@mips.mips.COM> Date: 21 Dec 89 16:19:39 GMT References: <1546@aber-cs.UUCP> Sender: news@mips.COM Reply-To: keith@mips.COM (Keith Garrett) Organization: MIPS Computer Systems, Sunnyvale, CA Lines: 30 In article <1546@aber-cs.UUCP> pcg@cs.aber.ac.uk (Piercarlo Grandi) writes: >In article <25177@cup.portal.com> mmm@cup.portal.com (Mark Robert Thorson) >writes: > > Hmmm... 26,000 devices, that's about 1.5 ENIAC's? I wonder what sort of > architecture they used? The most useful things I can think of at that > level would be a rasterizing engine and a cryptographic machine. > >I may be entirely wrong, but the Z8000, which is not a terribly useless >processor, and used to run Unix multiuser without trouble at the level of a >PDP-11/44 or a VAX 750, was something like 17,000 gates/transistors/devices >or whatever (yes, I know that the "whatever" matters), which is in the same >ballpark. Anybody knows better? my understanding is that the Z8000 contains around 50,000 transistors, which is about 17,000 equivalent logic gates. > >Actually, has anybody thought of the Z8000 as a "RISC"/simple machine (sure >the architecture was clean enough), and/or thought doing it in GaAs or other >fast, low density technology? > >In case you have not understood, I liked the Z8000 a lot. If only IBM had >chosen it instead of the 8088/8086... If only Zilog had managed to do an MMU >and restartable instructions soon enough... the MMU was fairly early, and the virtual memory changes turned out to be relatively easy. the development tools were very late. i think the lack of tools, and a weak marketing effort are what did in the z8000. -- Keith Garrett "This is *MY* opinion, OBVIOUSLY" UUCP: keith@mips.com or {ames,decwrl,prls}!mips!keith USPS: Mips Computer Systems,930 Arques Ave,Sunnyvale,Ca. 94086