Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mstar!mstar.morningstar.com!bob From: bob@MorningStar.Com (Bob Sutterfield) Newsgroups: comp.emacs Subject: Re: InfoTex Message-ID: Date: 14 Dec 89 19:19:46 GMT References: <283@digi.UUCP> Sender: news@MorningStar.COM (USENET Administrator) Reply-To: bob@MorningStar.Com (Bob Sutterfield) Organization: Morning Star Technologies Lines: 25 In-reply-to: kgallagh@digi.UUCP's message of 13 Dec 89 22:02:02 GMT In article <283@digi.UUCP> kgallagh@digi.UUCP (Kevin Gallagher) writes: The file "emacs.tex" is written using the texinfo macros found in the same "man" directory in the file "texinfo.texinfo". Nope, the macros are in texinfo.tex. texinfo.texinfo is documentation on texinfo, written in texinfo. It was named .texinfo because the name texinfo.tex was already taken, by the macros themselves. In order to generate a hardcopy of the manual, place emacs.tex and texinfo.texinfo into your default directory. You'll need emacs.tex and texinfo.tex. If you want to print the texinfo documentation, you'll need texinfo.texinfo, which also invokes macros found in texinfo.tex. It is a lot less bother and cheaper, in the long run, to send FSF $15 for a bound copy, or $60 for a box of 6 bound copies. You'll need to decide for yourself whether it's more bother to generate a check and await delivery, or do it yourself in about five minutes using local resources (paper, CPU cycles, etc.) Also, buying manuals or ordering tapes have been found to be convenient ways for some folks in some organizations to get their organizations to write a check to FSF, explicitly supporting their work without having to explain the politics to the higher-ups. Your choice...