Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!pilchuck!dataio!bright
From: bright@Data-IO.COM (Walter Bright)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: TurboC 2.0 Prof vs uSoft C 5.1
Message-ID: <2266@dataio.Data-IO.COM>
Date: 20 Dec 89 20:03:40 GMT
References: <5438.2583C869@urchin.fidonet.org> <1989Dec19.151531.25554@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu>
Reply-To: bright@dataio.Data-IO.COM (Walter Bright)
Organization: Data I/O Corporation; Redmond, WA
Lines: 9

In article <1989Dec19.151531.25554@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu> kevin@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Kevin Harris) writes:
<	I hereby register my vote for both TC 2.0 w/debugger and
<MS-c 5.1 (althought I really like Codeview.) |->

The votes that count are the votes that come with hard-earned dollars to
*purchase* the product! :-)
Votes count double if they're buying an upgrade!

The compiler wars are won and lost at the cash register.