Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!lavaca.uh.edu!uhnix1!uhnix2!davison
From: davison@uhnix2.uh.edu (Daniel B. Davison)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.fortran
Subject: Re: FIRST public review; I didn't bother 2nd time either
Message-ID: <936@uhnix2.uh.edu>
Date: 17 Dec 89 18:43:58 GMT
References: <589@unmvax.unm.edu> <14177@lambda.UUCP>
Reply-To: davison@uhnix2.UUCP (PUT YOUR NAME HERE)
Organization: University of Houston
Lines: 15

In article <14177@lambda.UUCP> jlg@lambda.UUCP (Jim Giles) writes:
>Most of the people I'm acquainted with who sent negative comments on the
>first public review didn't bother to send comments on the second.  This
>was usually explained to me as being a waste of time since the committee
>appeared to ignore the bulk of the first commentary.

I didn't, for exactly this reason.

dan
---
dr. dan davison/dept. of biochemical and biophysical sciences/univ. of
Houston/4800 Calhoun/Houston,TX 77054-5500/davison@uh.edu/DAVISON@UHOU

Disclaimer: As always, I speak only for myself, and, usually, only to
myself.