Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!wuarchive!texbell!ficc!peter
From: peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.fortran
Subject: Re: EQUIVALENCE, COMPUTED GO TO in FORTRAN 88?
Message-ID: <7357@ficc.uu.net>
Date: 19 Dec 89 15:55:17 GMT
References: <7329@ficc.uu.net> <14179@lambda.UUCP>
Reply-To: peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva)
Followup-To: alt.flame
Organization: Xenix Support, FICC
Lines: 13

In article <14179@lambda.UUCP> jlg@lambda.UUCP (Jim Giles) writes:
[lots of flames]

> I don't.  I dislike vagueness.  I _try_ to avoid relying on features
> which are vaguely defined.

That about covers every input/output statement in every language. how can
you live with yourself?
-- 
`-_-' Peter da Silva. +1 713 274 5180. <peter@ficc.uu.net>.
 'U`  Also <peter@ficc.lonestar.org> or <peter@sugar.lonestar.org>.
"It was just dumb luck that Unix managed to break through the Stupidity Barrier
and become popular in spite of its inherent elegance." -- gavin@krypton.sgi.com