Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!agate!violet.berkeley.edu!jerry
From: jerry@violet.berkeley.edu ( Jerry Berkman )
Newsgroups: comp.lang.fortran
Subject: Re: FIRST public review - response fina
Message-ID: <1989Dec19.184300.9085@agate.berkeley.edu>
Date: 19 Dec 89 18:43:00 GMT
References: <14164@lambda.UUCP> <6800003@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>
Sender: usenet@agate.berkeley.edu (USENET Administrator;;;;ZU44)
Reply-To: jerry@violet.berkeley.edu ( Jerry Berkman )
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
Lines: 15

In article <6800003@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> hirchert@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu writes:
>I suppose that since it is probably more than 15 days after even the last of
>the first round comments should have been received, this may be a moot issue
>by now, anyway.
>
>Kurt W. Hirchert     hirchert@ncsa.uiuc.edu
>National Center for Supercomputing Applications


It's not.  The reply to my first round comments was dated Nov. 30
and postmarked Dec. 1.  It states I have "15 working days of the
date of this letter", so there are still a few of us with a few
days left to mail in objections.  However, after a wait of 1 3/4
years, it is really unfair to allow only 3 weeks for a reply.
	- Jerry Berkman, U.C. Berkeley