Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!samsung!usc!native.usc.edu!king
From: king@native.usc.edu (Greg King)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.fortran
Subject: Re: EQUIVALENCE, COMPUTED GO TO in FORTRAN 88?
Message-ID: <21890@usc.edu>
Date: 20 Dec 89 21:48:15 GMT
References: <7320@ficc.uu.net> <14178@lambda.UUCP> <7329@ficc.uu.net> <591@unmvax.unm.edu> <7335@ficc.uu.net>
Sender: news@usc.edu
Reply-To: king@native.usc.edu (Greg King)
Organization: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
Lines: 8

In article <7335@ficc.uu.net> peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva) writes:
>
>This is a quality of implementation question. One could similarly claim that
>an OPEN statement could place a long-distance operator-assisted call to New
>York and have a newspaper vendor in Grand Central Station key the data in
>via touch-tone.

   You mean....this is not a good way to implement OPEN?