Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!swbatl!texbell!ficc!peter From: peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva) Newsgroups: comp.org.usenix Subject: Re: USENIX Board Studies UUCP Message-ID: <7317@ficc.uu.net> Date: 15 Dec 89 15:21:06 GMT References: <36700@apple.Apple.COM> <127@dumbcat.UUCP> <36766@apple.Apple.COM> <1989Nov26.001644.3176@utzoo.uucp> <93061@pyramid.pyramid.com> <46406@sgi.sgi. Reply-To: peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva) Organization: Xenix Support, FICC Lines: 24 In article spencer@eecs.umich.edu (Spencer W. Thomas) writes: >You should all read the Viewpoint column in this month's CACM. John >McCarthy writes "Networks considered harmful for electronic mail". Yeh, I read about it. It'd take a trivial change to uucp to support "mail phone-number!user", and after that it's a matter of politics to get people to allow the anonymous UUCP login. There wasn't a hell of a lot of meat to that article. It's nothing that gobs of people haven't been saying all along. It just takes someone to write the code. Change 1: you'd need to get uucp to do the connect to phone-number. Change 2: you'd need to get uucp to identify itself as your-phone-# when it makes the connection. Change 3: you'd need to do something about the chat script. All we need to get it started is to get someone to make the changes and ship the code. Certainly fair game for the Usenix folks. -- `-_-' Peter da Silva. +1 713 274 5180. . 'U` Also or . "It was just dumb luck that Unix managed to break through the Stupidity Barrier and become popular in spite of its inherent elegance." -- gavin@krypton.sgi.com