Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!mephisto!ncsuvx!mcnc!rti!xyzzy!poirier
From: poirier@dg-rtp.dg.com (Charles Poirier)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: comp.sys.amiga.games - what do you think?
Summary: What games postings?
Message-ID: <1455@xyzzy.UUCP>
Date: 15 Dec 89 16:10:22 GMT
References: <2637@caesar.cs.montana.edu> <74677@tut.cis.ohio-state.edu> <2299@jolnet.ORPK.IL.US>
Sender: usenet@xyzzy.UUCP
Reply-To: poirier@dg-rtp.dg.com (  Poirier local)
Lines: 12

In article <2299@jolnet.ORPK.IL.US> swan@jolnet.UUCP (Joel Swan) writes:
>However, it would be a nice
>relief to my "n" and "k" keys to bypass all the "games" postings.

I just don't understand.  The percentage of c-s-a postings dealing with
games is tiny.  I could just as easily start whining about all the hard
drive traffic: several times the gaming traffic, I'd estimate.  But I won't.
We can't be constantly picking nits about minuscule subtopics that
someone or other wishes would go away.

I vote *no* on a separate amiga.games group.

	Charles Poirier