Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!wuarchive!udel!udccvax1!sun.acs.udel.edu!barry
From: barry@sun.acs.udel.edu (Barry Fausnaugh)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: 68040 vs 80246 (Was Re: Xerox sues Apple!!!)
Message-ID: <6037@sun.acs.udel.edu>
Date: 18 Dec 89 01:55:58 GMT
References: <many> <last> <was> <14960@boulder.Colorado.EDU> <18213@netnews.upenn.edu>
Reply-To: barry@sun.acs.udel.edu (Barry Fausnaugh)
Organization: University of Delaware
Lines: 14

In article <18213@netnews.upenn.edu> meuchen@grad2.cis.upenn.edu (Paul Eric Menchen) writes:
>
>lots of stuff deleted
>>
>Why not include the 80486.  From what I here, the 68040 is plenty
>faster.  I don't remember the specifics - as a matter of fact I don't
>think the specs are out but word is it's faster.

Not only that, but haven't a number of the 486 chips been recalled due to a 
serious bug in the architecture or something like that.  I vaguely remember 
reading that somewhere...have to see if I can drudge up the article.
-- 
Arpa: barry@vax1.acs.udel.edu
Uucp: ...{ihnp4,unidot,uunet}!cfg!udel!udccvax1!barry