Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!ut-emx!walt.cc.utexas.edu!hcobb
From: hcobb@walt.cc.utexas.edu (Henry J. Cobb)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: 68040 vs 80486
Keywords: vaporhardware
Message-ID: <22552@ut-emx.UUCP>
Date: 20 Dec 89 01:55:07 GMT
Sender: news@ut-emx.UUCP
Reply-To: hcobb@walt.cc.utexas.edu (Henry J. Cobb)
Organization: The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas
Lines: 15


	Oh sure, our theoretical benchmarks are faster than your theoretical
benchmarks, etc.

	Can't this wait until both IBM and Apple are shipping real hardware?
That way everybody can complain that Apple's implementation is silly because
they are mapping everything below the 16M mark due to their memory management
requirements.  And how much faster the Amiga 4000 would be if only some Amiga
user could afford an Oh'40.

	BTW I aint never heard of a bug list for something that didn't exist,
and I'm sure that the Oh'40 will cause enough headaches when it finally does
ship.

	Henry J. Cobb	hcobb@walt.cc.utexas.edu