Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!shadooby!samsung!uunet!zephyr.ens.tek.com!orca.wv.tek.com!vsgft1!whansen
From: whansen@vsgft1.WV.TEK.COM (Bill Hansen;;63-171;;vsgft1)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Splitting Up Comp.Sys.Amiga--A new idea
Message-ID: <5699@orca.wv.tek.com>
Date: 21 Dec 89 17:47:04 GMT
References: <682@alias.UUCP>
Sender: nobody@orca.wv.tek.com
Reply-To: whansen@vsgft1.WV.TEK.COM (Bill Hansen)
Organization: Tektronix, Inc., Wilsonville, OR
Lines: 17

In article <682@alias.UUCP> kpicott%alias@csri.utoronto.ca (Socrates) writes:
>Looking at the traffic distribution I would say that the best way to split
>up c.s.a would be to create either c.s.a.d for discussions about the Amiga,
>or c.s.a.questions to answer problems.
>
>What sayeth the net?
>
> Kevin Picott   aka   Socrates   aka   kpicott%alias@csri.toronto.edu

Actually I've always wanted comp.sys.amiga.a2000 comp.sys.amiga.a500 etc.
While I'm sympathetic to 500 owners who have bad power supplies or such,
I'd really rather not see a zillion postings about it. In the same light,
do you 500 owners really care about the latest whiz bang card for the 2000?

Just a thought.

				Bill Hansen