Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!zephyr.ens.tek.com!uw-beaver!apollo!oj
From: oj@apollo.HP.COM (Ellis Oliver Jones)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apollo
Subject: Re:  memory allocation bug
Message-ID: <47821de1.20b6d@apollo.HP.COM>
Date: 19 Dec 89 00:12:00 GMT
References: <8912141641.AA09668@umix.cc.umich.edu>
Sender: root@apollo.HP.COM
Reply-To: oj@apollo.hp.com
Organization: Apollo Computer, Chelmsford, MA
Lines: 15

In article <8912141641.AA09668@umix.cc.umich.edu> Dave Erstad took issue with my posting:

>>   Hmm, either your definition of the term "November Patch Tape" is different
>>   from ours, or you have a strange tape.  As far as I can tell, there
>>   wasn't a Prism November patch tape, and the Moto tape contained
>>   only patches related to the X Window System.

Dave wrote:
>There were many non-X patches (over half, I'm sure).  The bulk seemed
>to fix sau7/DN4500 problems.

He's right.  The patch tapes are cumulative, of course.   I feel
unnaturally possessive about the November tape because I prepared the
only two NEW patches on it.  Sorry for the wrong info.
/Ollie Jones.